194
Arctic Yearbook 2013
Sowa
the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). Apart from the funding granted, I am grateful
for the support given by the interdisciplinary Ph.D. Program ―Cultural Hermeneutics: Refl ections
of Difference and Transdifference‖ at Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg in
Germany, the International Ph.D. School for Studies of Arctic Societies (IPSSAS), and the
Ilisimatusarfik (University of Greenland). Parts of this article have been presented at the 18th
Annual ASN World Convention at the Harriman Institute, Columbia University, in New York,
USA. The author is thankful for fruitful discussions and commentaries.
Notes
1.
To guarantee the anonymity of the expert group, neither the grounds for appointing the
group, nor the time when it was established, nor the composition of the group will be dealt
with here.
2.
This working paper was written in Danish and was drafted in several versions. I will call these
two internal working papers ―document A‖ and ―document B‖.
3.
The
Inuit Circumpolar Conference
changed the name to
Inuit Circumpolar Council
in 2005.
4.
The report
Our Common Future
is often named after the commissions‗ chair, Gro Harlem
Brundtland (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987).
5.
Introduction (chapter 1), Traditional knowledge (chapter 2), ILO convention 169 (chapter 3),
IUCN and the right to live directly from natural resources (chapter 4), Biodiversity convention
(chapter 5), Inuit Circumpolar Conference and the Arctic Council (chapter 6), Whaling
Commission (chapter 7), Property relations (chapter 8), The United Nations (chapter 9),
Cooperation with Denmark (chapter 10), Greenland‘s rejection of racial criteria (chapter 11),
Ethnicity and language (chapter 12), The profile of self-government (chapter 13), and
Conclusions and recommendations (chapter 14).
References
Berkes, F. (1993). Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Perspective. In Julian Inglis (Ed.).
Traditional
ecological knowledge: concepts and cases
(pp. 1-9). Ottawa, Ont., Canada: International Program on
Traditional Ecological Knowledge: International Development Research Centre.
Berkes, F. (1994). Co-management: bridging the two solitudes.
Northern Perspectives.
22(2-3): 18-20.
Berkes, F. (1999).
Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and resource management
. Philadelphia, Pa.
u.a.: Taylor & Francis.
Berkes, F, George, P., & Preston, R. J. (1991). Co-management: The Evolution in Theory and
Practice of the Joint Administration of Living Resources.
Alternatives.
18(2): 12-18.